Best free plagiarism checker
Each of us for any possible reason were searching for a free products or services. For some reason, you might want to try using the services of a free plagiarism checker. In this article, we will evaluate free plagiarism checkers and compare them to paid alternatives.
The criteria for evaluating free plagiarism checkers
Before starting the evaluation we should choose the criteria. We use a really huge amount of criteria for evaluation and comparison against competitors. Most of these criteria have little value for commercial use of the service. For example, the false positive ratio will not have much of the value to the user, differently to the similarity score (which is not always perfectly represent the quality of detection).
In the current comparison, we will focus on commercially demanded criteria for plagiarism checkers. This way we will assure that the results will better fit your expectations.
Rules for the criteria for comparison of plagiarism checkers
- Commercially demanded
- Easily measurable
In our world, the concept of free goods is adored and blown out of proportion. Movies, TV shows and books are written about winning the lottery, finding a stack of cash or gold just lying around etc. Even when you are just browsing and scrolling online, advertisements just catapult catchphrases like “TRY FOR FREE” or “Just do this and get this for free” at you. All of that is done for a main, single reason and purpose. Getting something without paying or expenditures sounds very nice. In reality, however, nothing is free. You end up paying in one way or another. Maybe it is volatile handling of your personal data; maybe the “Free” service lives off showing you hundreds of unskippable ads that make your experience miserable and so on.
With free plagiarism checkers, they always lack the refinement and quality of those which are of premium quality and pay-to-use. It is especially true when we start to think about customer service. In this world, driven by our ideals and perceptions, it easy to get exploited by those who are looking for quick benefits from your lack of awareness or sensitivity. However, nothing is that simple beneath the surface.
Free plagiarism checker for students – not effective
Alright, we will not be so rough and critical. There could be an excellent free plagiarism checker but isn’t. For academic purposes, you wish to compare your scientific analysis, thesis and related documents in the world of science and research; you have to have access to the databases of universities and colleges. These are usually kept exclusively private for the students and community members of those individual schools. A private database. Access to these databases is only granted to partner universities, business partners or paying outsiders. Most plagiarism checkers are partners with universities or are paying for access to their database. Free plagiarism checkers do not have access to such databases and thus offer only a fraction of sources. Most of the sources which free plagiarism checkers have are free-to-access therefore anyone with time can compare them on their own. These software units only help you do it faster, but it is still far from an in-depth check.
Imagine having to contact and deal with hundreds or even thousands of academic institutions. The cost of running and handling a vast database is not cheap. Thus, there are some costs which the software developers have to cover — all for the benefit of the client. If the plagiarism checker has a vast database, its users can avoid plagiarism better, right?
Until those databases remain private, which they will for a long, long time, free plagiarism checking for university students is not really useful.
The same tune when it comes down to businesses
Businesses have private databases also. Almost 90 per cent of the entire content found online is private business or company data. When it comes down to archived articles, indexed content or copyright material, most of it is not available on the internet. You also have to have access to individual databases and websites for high-quality plagiarism prevention.
Not only do free plagiarism checkers fail to offer access to private academic databases, but when it comes down to business archives and databases, things get even grimmer for its users.
In reality, this is how the “Free” service works
Let us be very cruel. In our world, there is no such thing as free service. One way or another you have to pay for the service developers, its maintenance, improvements and other things. Some project owners will put lots of ads all over the site, which make the site repulsive or even difficult to use. Others cut costs by making the service seem visually appealing, but it lacks the in-depth content and features are scarce.
Free services usually try to manipulate your lack of awareness. They lure clients in by offering a lot of benefits which are seemingly accessible free of charge. In reality, however, things are going to be different once you access the service and start using it.
Both free and premium services have to earn money to be sustainable and keep running. Free services just deceive you in one way or another and are always backpedalling to the premium detectors. Either through the excessive placement of ads, lack of features, bad interface or related issues, developers seek to cut costs and earn as much money from their “Free project”.
Premium = quality services
One of the vastly overlooked things with free services that people ignore almost completely is customer service. Free plagiarism checkers are no exception. Do you want someone to help you in case of a problem if a question arises or maybe you feel something has gone wrong? Free services have no stable income; thus they shy away from employing real people to help you, and if something goes wrong, you are left on your own.
Premium services do invest a lot into project development, the betterment of UX and UI, expanding databases and much much more. All in all – best free plagiarism checker is not existent. Why? Because it is not free at all.
May 28, 2019 @ 2:03 pm
Good n effective